“The
first point to which our attention has been directed was the expediency
of erecting a building which should be secure from danger by fire.”
~Congressional Committee on Public Buildings, 1835
Mills’ involvement with the architecture of the
early Treasury building proved to be a rewarding transition toward obtaining
his commission for the third and existing Treasury Building. In 1833,
the Department of Treasury endured a second major fire leaving the building
in ruins. Despite the increased cost and lengthy construction of fireproof
construction, preventing the further loss of important government documents
and property became a priority for a government in a city that recently
suffered significant damage from fires. Furthermore, the fireproofing
of a new Treasury building was particularly important given the department’s
holdings of currency and public records. Congress therefore sought to
replace the second Treasury building with one using the newest advances
of fireproof technology.
Mills was an obvious choice having established a respectable record for
vaulted construction among only a handful of American architects familiar
with this technology. He already even sketched the surviving structure
of Latrobe’s vaulted wing on the original Treasury building as documentation
to the resilience of the vaulted masonry. Given his experience and his
powers of persuasion, in 1836 Mills successfully convinced President Jackson
to appoint him Architect of Public Buildings, beginning with the commission
for the design and construction of the new Treasury building.
Mills employed his knowledge of materials, construction, and design to
create the building that is our legacy today. The Treasury building is
built entirely of masonry rather than wood, using the groin vaults made
from brick for the module. This groin vault is a design of two intersecting
barrel vaults based on the arch. Mills’ use of the groin vault used
in a building on a large scale was a unique practice for its time. Instead
of using lime mortar typically used in bricklaying, Mills’ used
a new fast-drying hydraulic cement that allowed the walls to be a narrow
2’-3” wide rather than the 3’-6” thick, typical
masonry wall. A hurdle blocking the assembly however, was the lack of
masons versed in vaulting construction. Mills proved his versatility,
training the masons hired for the project in the vaulting and thus the
Treasury’s fireproof vaults were realized. The barrel and groin
vaults used for the interior spaces may still be seen throughout the corridors
of the center and east wings, a testament to the strength and resilience
that characterizes Mills’ buildings.
For more information of Fireproof Construction, see The
Fireproof Building: Technology and Public Safety in the Ninteenth-Century
American City, by Sara E. Wermiel, The Johns Hopkins University Press,
©2000.
|